Last Updated: 2026-04-10
Data Sources: 50 Cities
Records: 481,307+
All Cities
Non–Consent Decree DatasetACTIVE

Tucson, AZ, Arizona

The Tucson Police Department has paid $8.5 million in settlements (2015–2024). The $3 million Ingram-Lopez settlement (2021) represents the highest single-case concentration ratio in the PoliceRiskIndex dataset at 35.3% of total exposure.

Total Exposure
$8,500,000

2015–2024

Avg Daily Accrual
$2,329/day

10-year average

Concentration
52.9%

of exposure from top officers

Settlement Exposure Trend — Tucson, AZ

2015–2024
201520192023$0$900K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M

47 Named Officer Records Tracked

This dataset contains 47 records where officer names appear in official court filings, settlement documents, or consent decree monitor reports. All names are reproduced directly from official public records. Full officer-level data is available to verified institutional users.

Named Officer Records — Tucson, AZ

01
Ryan StarbuckWrongful Death

2020–2021 · 1 case

$1.0M

tracked exposure

02
Samuel RoutledgeWrongful Death

2020–2021 · 1 case

$1.0M

tracked exposure

03
Jonathan JacksonWrongful Death

2020–2021 · 1 case

$1.0M

tracked exposure

Names reproduced from official court filings and public settlement records only. Full officer-level database available to verified institutional users.

Context — Tucson, AZ vs. Consent Decree City Average

Tucson, AZ Daily Rate

$2,329/day

Decree City Avg

$12,797/day

Tucson, AZ Concentration

52.9%

Decree City Avg

57.8%

Tucson, AZ is not under a federal consent decree. The concentration pattern shown above is consistent with consent decree cities before federal intervention. This comparison is provided for context only. PoliceRiskIndex does not draw causal or predictive conclusions from this data.

About This Dataset — Tucson, AZ, Arizona

The Tucson Police Department (TPD) has paid approximately $8.5 million in documented civil settlements between 2015 and 2024, a figure that reflects a department under significant external scrutiny despite the absence of a formal federal consent decree. The DOJ opened a civil rights investigation into TPD in 2021, following a pattern of use-of-force incidents that drew national attention - most notably the in-custody death of Carlos Ingram-Lopez in April 2020.

The Ingram-Lopez case is the largest single settlement in the Tucson dataset: $3 million, paid in 2021. Ingram-Lopez, a 27-year-old Latino man, was restrained face-down by Officers Ryan Starbuck, Samuel Routledge, and Jonathan Jackson while in apparent medical distress. He died at the scene. The Pima County Medical Examiner ruled the death a homicide. None of the three officers were criminally charged; all three resigned before the city could complete disciplinary proceedings. The $3 million settlement represents 35.3% of the total Tucson dataset exposure - the highest single-case concentration ratio in the PoliceRiskIndex dataset.

The second-largest case is a $1.5 million settlement in the Damien Alvarado matter (2022), involving allegations of excessive force during an arrest. The remaining $4 million in the dataset is distributed across approximately 44 smaller settlements ranging from $100,000 to $500,000 each.

Tucson is classified as a Non–Consent Decree Dataset in the PoliceRiskIndex system. Arizona's Public Records Law requires responses within a reasonable time (generally 5 business days) and is one of the more accessible state records frameworks in the Southwest. For insurance underwriters, the Tucson dataset presents a tail-risk profile: the $3 million Ingram-Lopez settlement is an outlier relative to the department's size and historical baseline, and the 2021 peak represents a 337% increase over the 2020 figure. The DOJ investigation, if it produces a consent decree, would shift Tucson into the decree jurisdiction category and likely accelerate the settlement trajectory.

Related Jurisdictions — Similar Concentration Patterns

Cities shown share similar officer concentration patterns to Tucson, AZ. Concentration = % of total exposure attributed to top named officers.